The Climate Web

HOME/INDEX/HELP

HOVER OVER THUMBNAILS TO EXPAND

2014/7 A BIG WIN in a Coal Battle!

2014/7 Citing Climate Change I..

2014/7 Coal Mine's Rejection on..

I:SCCinPolicyandRegulation

Two federal court decisions have..

S - Litigation Cases

S - SCC in Litigation

2014 High Country Conservation Advocates v USFS - US District Ct Colorad..

2007 Massachusetts v EPA

2008 Opinion in Center for Biolog..

200X Seattle City Light Offsets Suit..

2011 AEP v Connecticut - US Supr..

2011 Coalition for Responsible Envir..

2012 Cherniak v Kitzhaber - Ore..

2012 Gerrard_What litigation of a..

2012 Petition of Sherley et al to..

2012_Citizens Climate Lobby v..

2013 Cherniak v Kitzhaber - Or..

2013 Citizens Climate Lobby v Ca..

2013 Keogh_WildEarth Guardians..

Because agencies didn't reasonable justify their SCC thinking, it was arbitrar..

Defendants argued that there was no standardized protocol for assessing..

Defendants included the SCC in the draft EIS, but simply dropped it from t..

NEPA doesn't required C/B analysis, but it's arbitrary and capricious to incl..

WildEarth Guardians v Jewell can be distinguished because SCC wasn't raised

2014 High Country Conservation Advocates v USFS - Social Cost of Carbon.pdf
162.3 KB 7/5/14 6:12 PM